Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, SEI/ASCE 7-05
ثبت نشده
چکیده
1 General.........................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Scope .........................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Definitions ..................................................................................................................................................1 1.3 Basic Requirements ...................................................................................................................................1 1.3.1 Strength. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....................................................1 1.3.2 Serviceability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................................1 1.3.3 Self-Straining Forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................2 1.3.4 Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....................................................2 1.3.5 Counteracting Structural Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......................................2 1.4 General Structural Integrity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................. 2 1.5 Classification of Buildings and Other Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................2 1.5.1 Nature of Occupancy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................2 1.5.2 Toxic, Highly Toxic, and Explosive Substances. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..............................2 1.6 Additions and Alterations to Existing Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................2 1.7 Load Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........................................3 1.8 Consensus Standards and Other Referenced Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................3
منابع مشابه
A Discussion of Power Plant Loads and Load Combinations
This paper focuses on the design of steel support structures within electrical power generating facilities (power plants) which burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. The design of power plant structures requires the determination of loads, some of which will already be familiar to any practicing structural engineer, and some of which are specific to power plant structures. This paper provi...
متن کاملLearning from Earthquakes The Tohoku , Japan , Tsunami of March 11 , 2011 : Effects on Structures
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has sponsored several reconnaissance teams to survey effects of the great East Japan earthquake and Tohoku tsunami. The first of these was the tsunami team, which traveled to Japan from April 15 to May 1, 2011, and focused on tsunami effects on coastal buildings, bridges, port facilities and coastal protective structures. All seven members of the t...
متن کاملAssessment of ASCE 41-06 Pushover Procedure in Performance Evaluation of Concrete Vertical Irregular Buildings
Irregular buildings make up a large portion of urban infrastructure. Presence of irregularities can be due to architectural and user changes in building stories. Main objective of this article is evaluate seismic performance of structures with vertical irregularities. Seismic responses are obtained by enveloping peak inelastic responses resulting from pushover analyses according to provided p...
متن کاملSeismic Screening, Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Design Provisions for Wood-Framed Structures
Seismic screening, evaluation, and rehabilitation design of two existing wood-framed structures are performed using FEMA 154, FEMA 356, ASCE/SEI 31, and the 1997 UBC. FEMA 154 screening demonstrates the importance of examining construction drawings. Plans revealed a structural deficiency, but screening alone indicated no further evaluation is needed. Demand-to-capacity ratios for shear walls an...
متن کاملFragility Assessment of Light-Frame Wood Construction Subjected to Wind and Earthquake Hazards
A fragility analysis methodology is developed for assessing the response of light-frame wood construction exposed to stipulated extreme windstorms and earthquakes. Performance goals and limit states (structural and nonstructural) are identified from a review of the performance of residential construction during recent hurricanes and earthquakes in the United States. Advanced numerical modeling ...
متن کامل